Benefits of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)
CGM — the new standard
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) has gained acceptance within the diabetes community
as an effective tool for helping patients achieve their diabetes goals
1:
- Achieve A1c targets without adding hypoglycemia2-4
- Reduce hypoglycemia2-4
- Reduce glucose variability2-4
A recent study by the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation showed that using a
CGM, such as the SEVEN® PLUS, for at least 6 days a week can lead
to significant decreases in A1c and can provide a greater ability to reach the ADA
recommended goal of 7%.4 Evidence such as this is exactly why many of
the nation’s largest insurance companies are now providing coverage for this revolutionary
technology.
Click here to see how all CGMs are not created
equal.
To learn more, click one of the topics below:
Meeting the goals of self-management
The goal of diabetes self-management is to help patients optimally manage their
diabetes based on:
- Individual needs
- Customized goals
- Personal lifestyle considerations
Back to top
Real-time trending = 288 fingersticks
Fingerstick monitoring alone does not provide enough information for patients to
act preemptively to avoid hyper- and hypoglycemic events.1-8 A major
benefit of CGM is that it can help patients identify fluctuations and trends that
would otherwise go unnoticed with standard fingerstick testing.
The SEVEN PLUS measures glucose levels and sends a glucose value every 5 minutes
from the Transmitter to the Receiver. This is equivalent to a patient taking 288
fingerstick readings daily. However, unlike fingersticks, patients see real-time
trending of glucose levels and patterns. The SEVEN PLUS shows patients their current
glucose value, as well as their glucose trend over the past several hours (1-, 3-,
6-, 12-, and 24-hour trends). It also tells them how quickly their glucose is changing.
And when glucose levels go above or below the set target range, alerts notify patients
so they are able to take corrective action before going too low or too high —
helping them
Stay Between The Lines®
.
Back to top
A1c tests vs. true glucose variability
While A1c tests have been considered the gold standard for years, these tests do
not necessarily correlate to good diabetes control. Recent studies evaluating patients
considered to be "well-controlled" (who maintain an A1c level of approximately 7%)
reveal that these patients had less control than expected. When using CGM, study
results demonstrate that the patients were actually experiencing extensive fluctuations
in glucose levels.6 CGM, especially in conjunction with A1c, helps to
show a more complete picture of glucose control.
Back to top
Damage caused by glucose variability
There is a growing body of clinical evidence showing that glucose variability itself
— independent of A1c — initiates a cascade of physiological damage.2,6,9-11
Over time, hyper- and hypoglycemic events significantly increase the risk of diabetic
complications, such as retinopathy and general microvascular pathogenesis, at least
partially due to increases in oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory cytokines that
are triggered by hyper- and hypoglycemic swings.2,6,9-11
Back to top
Unnoticed highs and lows revealed by CGM
As a clinician, you probably have patients that experience hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia
so often that they no longer realize when they have symptoms. Large-scale studies
have shown, over time, these glycemic excursions cause major complications to the
vascular system and organs. A CGM device can call attention to dangerously low overnight
glucose levels that often go undetected, reveal previously unnoticed hyperglycemia
spike trends between meals, show early morning highs in glucose, clarify the way
diet and exercise affect your patients' glucose levels and provide a long-term comprehensive
assessment of the effects of adjustments in diabetes management.2,3,8
Click here to learn more
about SEVEN PLUS performance and clinical validation.
Back to top
References:
- Standards of medical care in diabetes — 2009. American Diabetes Association.
Diabetes Care. 2009;32 Suppl 1:S13-61.
- Garg S, et al. Improvement in glycemic excursions with a transcutaneous, real-time
continuous glucose sensor: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care.
2006;29(1):44-50.
- Garg SK, et al. Continuous home monitoring of glucose: improved glycemic control
with real-life use of continuous glucose sensors in adult subjects with type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care. 2007;30(12):3023-3025.
- Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group
(2008) Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes.
N Engl J Med. 2008;359(14):1464-1476.
- Waldron-Lynch F, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring: long live the revolution!
Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2009;5(2):82-83.
- Hirsch IB. Glycemic variability: it's not just about A1C anymore! Diabetes Technol
Ther. 2005;7(5):780-783.
- Brauker JH, et al. The function of continuous glucose sensors: How and why seeing
glucose as a function of time enables proactive management decisions to avoid highs
and lows. Rev Endo. May 2007.
- Deiss D, et al. Improved glycemic control in poorly controlled patients with type
1 diabetes using real-time continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care.
2006;29(12):2730-2732.
- Brownlee M, et al. Glycemic variability: a hemoglobin A1c-independent risk factor
for diabetic complications. JAMA. 2006;295(14):1707-1708.
- Brownlee M. The pathobiology of diabetic complications: a unifying mechanism.
Diabetes. 2005;54(6):1615-1625.
- Gerich JE, et al. The rationale for paired pre- and postprandial self-monitoring
of blood glucose: the role of glycemic variability in micro- and macrovascular risk.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23(8):1791-1798.